Choose from description below Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

get from description below - Research Paper ExampleLee is a Correspondent at the Alberta University - Edmonton Clinic health Academy. Her member focuses on driving whilst on as an emerging problem that wishings urgent solutions. trunk Summary The articles exclusively center on the regulatory laws that have placed limitations on the use of the cubicle ph singles by the drivers. It is evident that a majority of the states have embarked on a mission to ensure that the roving headphones be handled properly by the concerned drivers whilst on the roads. Despite the laws ranging from one state to another, the laws focus on a recommendation of the use of hands free devices by the drivers. On the other hand, Strayer& displaceargue that as a result of the constant use of the mobile phones by the drivers, a conduct of accidents have been seen to take place as drivers on phone are likely to over speed, cleave other traffic rules or even fail to stop for police checks (646). With driv ing taking the monetary value of using one hand, while the other is busy texting or receiving a call, Lee argues that a brood of lives have been lost as a result of the same (7728). The costs of distracted driving in this case cannot be quantified especially if the lives of innocent individuals have to be at stake. Lee argues that at times, a lot of drivers are at pressure to be connected, an aspect that makes it almost an obvious behavior in the roads today (7723). The author also insists that the problem is a growing one (Lee 7725). It is evident that one of the major causes of deaths and injuries greatly correlates to this form of driving by the drivers. This explains why a lot of states have then(prenominal) embarked on the implementation of legislations that see to the banning of the handsets for the drivers. Drivers on phone were also said to be slow and to also lose focus whilst driving especially after a phone call (Strayer & draw641). It is at this juncture that the aut hors recommend legislation on the ban of cell phones whilst driving (Strayer & Drew644). Collet, Guillot & Petit are of the opinion that mobile phones lead to the drivers reacting slowly to responses whilst in the traffic environment (590). They also have tokenish control and less attention for visual information whilst driving thus, cannot focus on one practise (593).Legislation on the use of mobile phones amongst other measures like education would therefore be vital in the responsible use of the phones by the divers. Critique The articles analyzed in this work are ones that may be termed as valid and reliable as reference materials in relation to the theme topic. Collet, Guillot & Petits article is one that involves review studies on the topic so as to valid that legislations would be useful for present-day(prenominal) drivers. The authors shed light on the major effects on driving using a phone at the same time judging from the simulator works and field research. Its introduc tion gives a brief abstract of the article and what will be explained in terms of applicable data to authenticate that mobile phones need to be restricted. The conclusion then summarizes the facts thus, leading to the commendation that drivers need to correct their behaviour which can be facilitated through restrictions on the use of mobile phones whilst driving. Lees work, on the other hand, starts from an abstract that gives the delimitate of the article. The author then gives guidelines on how to deal with concerns in the topic, highlights on the dangers of driving while on phone, gives solutions to this terror and lastly gives a detailed conclusion