Realism and Its Role in US War Against Iraq Essay

Presence of biological war, brutal leadership, anti-democracy these were the reasons which were proclaimed in the past explaining US war against Iraq. I deliberate that US spearheaded by then President Bush played Realists in their decision-making vis a vis the issue at hand. Tony Blair himself admitted few months after US won Iraq over their Head of State, Saddam Hussein, that there were no biological warf are proven to be under the custody of the latters political science.Moreover, close to nations believe that despite Husseins dictatorial means, he was nonetheless feared hence was able to throw peaceful coexistence between two Moslem yet conflicting groups- the Sunni and Shiite. As regards, the question of the absence of democratic government in Iraq, isnt the establishment and sustainability of any government dependent on its constituents/nationals?Who is the United States to take away the chance from Iraqs own concourse to deal with their own government and its leader sh ould there be a question of legitimacy? Perhaps, guided by Realist perspective of International Relations, the following(a) reasons are more truthful protection, statism, and self-help. Military power according to naive realism is a measure of political power relations among states alongside frugal power. States are rational and unitary actors whose decisions are always based on a calculation of survival and national security.There is the absence of widely distributed principles while the lone(prenominal) guide of states in an anarchic set-up is pragmatic estimation of other states actions in solving problems. How then are these helpful in the analysis of US intentions toward Iraq? US seeking to maintain its global dominance would have to sustain military power. While Liberals and Idealists thought process world peace could be attained and that no more wars shall incessantly exist, US apparently showed that war is still a solution and a means to furthering state gains.Oil i s Iraqs source of wealth and power. If that was the only missing link to US superiority, by all means, US would engender hold of it. Oil promotes military and economic power. It also gives US security against threats from North Korea. Hence, for me, it was the desire of the Bush administration to retain hegemonic status- free from outer threats of every form that made US enter into a blasting war.