American History :: essays research papers fc

The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. Ones compensate to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free hale, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may non be submitted to vote they depend on the outcome of no elections. coercive Court Justice Robert Jackson The First Amendment of the get together States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of prospect from political science interference into semipublic affairs. Freedom of expression consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief. The Court has interpreted the First Amendment to apply to the correct federal government even though its neve rtheless mantic to be applied to the Congress. The First Amendment was written because at Americas beginning, citizens ordered to rush a guarantee of their basic freedoms. Without the First Amendment, religious minorities could be persecuted, the government might well establish a national religion, protesters could be silenced, the press could not criticize government, and citizens couldnt assemble for social change.Most slew believe in the right to free speech, but debate whether it should go forward flag-burning, hard-core rap and heavy-metal lyrics, tobacco advertising, hate speech, pornography, nude dancing, solicitation and motley forms of symbolic speech though many would agree to limiting several(prenominal) forms of free expression. A Phrase that is often used to describe expression that is combined with elements of conduct is Symbolic Expression. The Supreme Court has dealt with a series of cases and has made it clear that symbolic expression or expressive conduct may be protected by the First Amendment. on that point have been a plethora of cases on this issue and they have been highly controversial. One remarkable one was Texas vs. Johnson in 1984 during a Republican discipline Convention it was about a man who expressed his displeasure with the United States by burning an American Flag. This action of his took Gregory Johnson to court and the court came to a conclusion that burning the flag was speech and again determined that Johnson was only trying to send out a message through his location by the burning the flag.