Crime and Punishment and Raskolnikovs article, On Crime :: Crime Punishment Essays

Crime and Punishment and Raskolnikovs article, On CrimeRaskolnikovs article, On Crime, is alert to the understanding of his beliefs. This article also has a profound effect on Crime and Punishment as a whole, the subject matter cosmos one of the main themes of the novel. The idea of the incomparable man is referred to literally passim the book, alone also notable is the subconscious effect the idea has on Raskolnikov. Sometimes Raskolnikov is not even aware of this influence. It is important to note originality, or the ability to utter a new word, as a delineate characteristic of the extraordinary man. Therefore, we must take into account the presence of alike(p) ideas, those of Pisarev, Nietzsche, and nihilism, as these might bring to light the possibility that Raskolnikov is not original, a possibility that haunts him throughout the novel. Within the article Raskolnikov analyzes the psychology of a wicked before and after the crime. This main portion of the artic le is not discussed, entirely it is likely that the psychological explanation that Porfiry gives Raskolnikov later, in the examination, is very similar. During this later examination, Raskolnikov appears resentful, but never disputes what Porfiry tells him, perhaps because it is a regurgitation of Raskolnikovs own thoughts. In the finis meeting of the two men, Porfiry admits that he liked the article very much, and genuinely felt a connection with it. The one part of the main torso of the article that is mentioned is that the perpetration of a crime is always accompanied by illness (225). Porfiry comments that this idea is very original Raskolnikov welcomes this praise. Shortly, Porfiry moves on to the main head of their discussion, a topic only mentioned briefly in the article, the idea that indisputable persons...have a perfect right to commit breaches of morality and crimes (225). Raskolnikov immediately realizes that Porfiry is intentionally exaggerating the i dea, and decided to take up the challenge (226). Dostoevsky lets the reader know that the intercourse will be a battle of wits. The ensuing argumentative conversation makes the passage very entertaining, especially in contrast to later interviews mingled with the two, in which Porfiry does nearly all the talking (he loves to hear himself talk). Raskolnikov attempts to clarify his idea, explaining that the extraordinary people have the right, but are not bound, to overstep obstacles if it is inhering for the fulfillment of their idea.